From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 29 15:07:30 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC46D16A405;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7016343D48;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:07:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k3TF7T65007316; 
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:07:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:07:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <ygeu08ch1dc.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604291105080.10119@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <200604281203.k3SC3da7070033@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0604291031220.10119@sea.ntplx.net>
	<ygeu08ch1dc.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile cached.conf src/etc/defaults
 rc.conf
 src/etc/rc.d Makefile cached src/include nsswitch.h src/include/rpc rpcent.h
 src/lib/libc Makefile src/lib/libc/gen getgrent.c getpwent.c
 src/lib/libc/include nscache.h nscachedcli.h ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:07:31 -0000

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

> Hi,
>
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:39:47 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>>> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> said:
>
> deischen> Great work, but is there a reason why this is called cached instead
> deischen> of nscd?  There is prior precedent (Linux, Solaris) for nscd and
> deischen> nscd.conf, and cached is just too general.
>
> cached(8) doesn't do actuall lookup like nscd(8) does, basically.  So,
> I feel awkward to call cached(8) nscd(8).  However, it might be too
> general as you say.

Well, what is the difference between Linux/Solaris nscd and cached?
Is there a reason why we don't want the daemons to be functionally
equivalent?

-- 
DE