From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 21:31:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E62E16A41F; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tiger@whitetigersd.com) Received: from smtp.ixomaxip.com (dsl254-004-099.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.4.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB46643D46; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:31:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tiger@whitetigersd.com) Received: from [10.254.3.200] (ip-10-254-3-200.ixomaxip.com [10.254.3.200]) by smtp.ixomaxip.com (8.13.3/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0ILVFGv034909; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:31:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tiger@whitetigersd.com) Message-ID: <43CEB3A2.6060501@whitetigersd.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:31:14 -0800 From: Andrew L Kilpatrick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pav Lucistnik , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200601182059.k0IKxHZr025760@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200601182059.k0IKxHZr025760@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1245/Wed Jan 18 08:57:44 2006 on anakaris.ixomaxip.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91921: Update port: devel/p5-Algorithm-LCS Used MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR instead of a list of the servers to get distfile from X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tiger@whitetigersd.com List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:31:16 -0000 I really apologize for this. I was working off the original shar I had submitted, after looking at the Makefile in the ports tree, I realized someone else must have already fixed this. I'm still new to the whole process of submitting into the ports tree. I guess I should just be working off the actual port in the ports tree. Feel free to close the request.