Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 03:59:02 +0100 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: batching port builds Message-ID: <200607010359.06112.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <20060630193508.EDC6.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <200606301131.29593.daeg@houston.rr.com> <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060630193508.EDC6.GERARD@seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 01 July 2006 00:44, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens > > > for the port in whose directory you're currently in and all its > > > dependencies. > > > > > > See 'man ports' for more information. > > > > > > To use those with 'portupgrade -a' will probably take some custom > > > scripting. > > > > Ah, so there's no make.conf option for this? > > I have: BATCH= yes in my /etc/make.conf file and it works fine. It works better in the envronment, than in /etc/make.conf. Some deinstall scripts prompt for input, and pkg_delete doesn't read make.conf.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607010359.06112.list-freebsd-2004>