Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:18:51 +1000
From:      "Daren Isaacs" <Daren.I@daelive.com>
To:        "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD
Message-ID:  <1299457131.5611.11.camel@hal.daeonline.local>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLt-%2BQrK4GOzJAzyGG2byaJyrY_U7_f7oVLfkK@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTim_mTTLPA6KbT2b7pxm1ZmrS7cq5ew99P3zAFZa@mail.gmail.com> <1299454075.5611.3.camel@hal.daeonline.local> <AANLkTikLt-%2BQrK4GOzJAzyGG2byaJyrY_U7_f7oVLfkK@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>=20
> On 7 March 2011 07:27, daren <daren.i@daelive.com> wrote:
>        =20
>        =20
>         On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
>         really
>         > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>         >
>         > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and
>         found/fixed a few bugs
>         > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced
>         regressions. I'd
>         > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg)
>         support in
>         > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I
>         haven't
>         > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in
>         any way.
>         >
>         > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the
>         results.
>         >
>         > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n
>         support, but I
>         > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy
>         operation in any way.
>        =20
>        =20
>         Do these changes support the AR2427?
>=20
>=20
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:07 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> The AR2427 support in HEAD is still unstable. I'm just fleshing out
> the AR9280 support and finding/fixing regressions that have been
> introduced before I continue fixing up the AR9285/AR2427 support.
>=20
>=20
> Basically, 11g modes on the AR2427 start off fine but they stop being
> successfully TXed after a few hours. Maybe if you run it in 11b only
> mode it'll be stable enough for use.
>=20
>=20
> I do have an AR2427 in a laptop here so I can actually test it. :)
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> adrian
>=20

Ok great, thanks.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299457131.5611.11.camel>