From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 7 00:30:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC991065670; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:30:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Daren.I@daelive.com) Received: from mail.daelive.com (mail.daelive.com [121.50.207.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E8D8FC18; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from 192.168.10.86 ([192.168.10.86]) by dae-exch2.daeonline.local ([192.168.10.14]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:20:30 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from hal.daeonline.local by dae-exch2.daeonline.local; 07 Mar 2011 10:18:51 +1000 Organization: daelive X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) Organization: daelive X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:18:51 +1000 Message-ID: <1299457131.5611.11.camel@hal.daeonline.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD Thread-Index: AcvcXXe/U5dwT/61QEC8LIhaMVpB9w== References: <1299454075.5611.3.camel@hal.daeonline.local> From: "Daren Isaacs" To: "Adrian Chadd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daren Isaacs List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:30:57 -0000 >=20 > On 7 March 2011 07:27, daren wrote: > =20 > =20 > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd > really > > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and > found/fixed a few bugs > > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced > regressions. I'd > > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) > support in > > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I > haven't > > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in > any way. > > > > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the > results. > > > > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n > support, but I > > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy > operation in any way. > =20 > =20 > Do these changes support the AR2427? >=20 >=20 On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:07 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > The AR2427 support in HEAD is still unstable. I'm just fleshing out > the AR9280 support and finding/fixing regressions that have been > introduced before I continue fixing up the AR9285/AR2427 support. >=20 >=20 > Basically, 11g modes on the AR2427 start off fine but they stop being > successfully TXed after a few hours. Maybe if you run it in 11b only > mode it'll be stable enough for use. >=20 >=20 > I do have an AR2427 in a laptop here so I can actually test it. :) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > adrian >=20 Ok great, thanks.