From owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Mon Nov 6 02:39:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA71E57E42 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B114754D9 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vA62dWuR014629 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:39:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 220309] usr.bin.grep.grep_test:mmap_eof_not_eol failing after jemalloc upgrade Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:39:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:39:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220309 --- Comment #3 from Kyle Evans --- (In reply to Ngie Cooper from comment #2) Apologies- this completely fell off of my radar. I'm considering ripping th= is test out. I haven't been able to conceive of a way to test this regression without the redzone support, since it relies on a subtle overflow. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=