From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 01:46:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9080106566B for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6018FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 82E1E5C3D; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:29:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:29:59 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110319012959.GA39929@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: status cleanup X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:46:04 -0000 A co-worker noticed that the pf rc script has 'status' listed twice when run without any arguments. The attached patch fixes that and two other cases where this also happens. I've only tested the pf changes. I'd appreciate a review of this and maybe a commit? I can file a PR if it would make people feel better. I'm not subscribed to this list so I would appreciate being CC'ed on any replies. -- WXS