Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:41:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "James A. Mutter" <jmutter@netwalk.com> To: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com> Cc: jmutter@netwalk.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mindcruft ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051240240.385-100000@insomnia.local.net> In-Reply-To: <14128.28612.595577.421402@hip186.ch.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> Well, someone asked this a few days ago and the general response was :> that Mindcraft's reputation was rather tainted at the moment. It :> would be nice though to see a test, formal or informal, of FreeBSD :> 3.X, Linux (Whatever is the latest stable kernel), and NT 4.0 all :> tuned by a professional on the same hardware, same situation, etc... :> Generally, a fair test on a level playing field. : :I definitely agree. All that URL did was talk about Linux, linux, linux. :Linux this and Linux that ... I'm quite sure that FreeBSD could hold its own :against Linux on the same hardware. It would sure be cool to be able to :steal some of the PR on this. And, if by some chance, we didn't score as :well as we needed to, we could use that as constructive criticism and go :work on those areas (since we seem to have the goal to be the "server of :choice" and this benchmark was server stuff ... not how well Office clones :or WindowMaker work to take over world domination from M$). : Anyone out there with the hardware and software to make something like this happen? Even informally, I'd like to know, I'm sure others would too. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051240240.385-100000>