Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:50:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: aj305523@tampabay.rr.com (Al Johnson) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top posting Message-ID: <200403192250.i2JMoQC26428@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040319223506.GA63254@bhunter.net> from "Al Johnson" at Mar 19, 2004 05:35:06 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm with you... Top-posting makes the most sense for me. No, it is like reading all the answers and then being handed the questions. I know some college students like to function that way, but... Top posting doesn't fit in to a naturally conversational style. I occasionally top post when me response is a general comment and not specific to any part of the question, but mostly responses in where they make the most sense (hopefully). ////jerry > I was born to top-post. > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:28:24PM -0800, Charles McManis wrote: > > Perhaps it isn't "logical", if you've read all the email then the quoted > > thread is just reference anyway. This is the "new stuff". I love being able > > to read mail in the preview-pane vs "next message" , jump to the bottom, > > "next message" jump to the bottom. > > > > It comes down to opinion I think > > --Chuck > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403192250.i2JMoQC26428>