From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 21 08:01:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7922B106566B for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from smadev.internal.net (host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E290A8FC1F for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nBL7tqep056473; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:55:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id nBL7toqr056472; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:55:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:55:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200912161656.07886.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <4B2BE255.4000307@telenix.org> <20091220164434.GA16068@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20091220164434.GA16068@misty.eyesbeyond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200912210955.50566.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Cc: Massimo Lusetti , Chuck Robey Subject: Re: General thoughts on java@freebsd-8/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:01:54 -0000 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Sunday 20 December 2009 18:44:34 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Gre= g Lewis =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > The down sides for openjdk6 are > that due to licensing restrictions there is now javaws or browser plugin > included. If those are important to you then you are better off sticking > with jdk16. >=20 Greg, thanx for clarifying that. What do you guess will happen in the future regarding the java plugin?=20 Is there any chance it will go (more) open source as well? =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios