From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 4 22:49:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from boris.netgate.net (boris.netgate.net [204.145.147.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A401337B6F9 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 22:49:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wellsian@caffeine.com) Received: from localhost (wellsian@localhost) by boris.netgate.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04428; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 22:47:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wellsian@caffeine.com) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 22:47:49 -0800 (PST) From: wellsian X-Sender: wellsian@boris.netgate.net To: "Dan O'Connor" Cc: Arthur Kelly , hemos , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD/BSDI Merger In-Reply-To: <0e3a01bf866d$4cd75180$0200000a@danco.home> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, that would be bad. But we'd all get much better with Linux. ;) I heard several months ago that BSDI was going to start incorporating more of FreeBSD's code into their own base. That's good for them; they had fallen behind for years. But that makes me wonder what FreeBSD gets from BSDI? Is there a discussion on this somewhere, with people who better understand the differences? Dave On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Dan O'Connor wrote: > Well, if this were say, a Microsoft merger, the point would be to kill-off > the (free) competition so the commercial product could flourish > unhindered. > > Let's hope the BSD world is a little more honorable... > > --Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message