From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 13:40:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0357106564A for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6687A8FC16 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so10101706iae.13 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:40:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ndhertbsd@gmail.com designates 10.43.44.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.43.44.202; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ndhertbsd@gmail.com designates 10.43.44.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ndhertbsd@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ndhertbsd@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.43.44.202]) by 10.43.44.202 with SMTP id uh10mr6446846icb.3.1329745241006 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:40:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4Rd2ZBVo2tHOjD6RtN0KO7uRreBh6ivWhlt+6KE7AFg=; b=UYchcgMdzpnWuvpsoUyEMuPxHDiCEHp9C3Htzham0Ii+qgA89iI4r7qpUFYhBLDmId sCQKL4I0Enl7aY+CSszohNHFPpbTCr8iAA8I8fYGaRvmYJ9qlPyRgJsDlCot3ZviYyRt PU3tmocG8+AU0Lw3LizpH0wRc9Ci6FBIR7M90= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.44.202 with SMTP id uh10mr5210177icb.3.1329745240928; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:40:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.158.65 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:40:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:40:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: libxul-1.9.2.27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:40:41 -0000 During a ports upgrade, I had an upgrade from libxul also. this took quite a long time to build and used lots of CPU power and made response time slow ... just for curiosity, I checked # pkg_info | grep libxul libxul-1.9.2.27 Mozilla runtime package that can be used to bootstrap XUL+X # pkg_info -R libxul-1.9.2.27 Information for libxul-1.9.2.27: (that is: nothing depends on it) I can't exactly remember how it got installed, but I was I think with (from /usr/ports/UPDATING) 20090917: AFFECTS: users of www/epiphany, x11/yelp, graphics/librsvg2, x11/toolkits/py-gnome-extras, and www/epiphany-extensions AUTHOR: gnome@FreeBSD.org The default Gecko provider has been changed from www/firefox to www/libxul. Firefox 2.x is now marked FORBIDDEN for security reasons, and libxul is new, stable, and preferred Gecko provider. Libxul uses the same Gecko engine as Firefox 3.0.x. Some ports may fail to upgrade or run when both www/firefox and libxul are installed on the same system. To make sure everything runs smoothly, uninstall www/firefox, then install libxul, then upgrade the affected ports. I have librsvg2 # pkg_info | grep librsvg2 librsvg2-2.34.1 Library for parsing and rendering SVG vector-graphic files But it does not use libxul (any more?) # pkg_info -r librsvg2-2.34.1 | grep xul (nothing) Can I safely do a # pkg_delete libxul-1.9.2.27 ??