From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 15 23:22:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.va.home.com (ha1.rdc1.va.home.com [24.2.32.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D0937B911 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 23:22:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jgowdy@home.com) Received: from cx443070a ([24.4.93.90]) by mail.rdc1.va.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP id <20000416062228.JFLJ22611.mail.rdc1.va.home.com@cx443070a>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 23:22:28 -0700 Message-ID: <001501bfa76d$9d7927a0$0100000a@vista1.sdca.home.com> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Zachary Drew" , Cc: References: Subject: Re: Slow samba 2.0.6 on FreeBSD 3.4 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 23:33:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > also smb (microsoft file sharing is really flakey... the samba teams > deserves huge credit for what they've already done... you shouldn't expect > great performance over a set up like that... or any smb set up for that > matter. > > this question my be more appropiate on a samba mailing list I'd like to add to that, that I'm running Samba on a Dual Pentium III 500, with 7200 rpm SCSI-3, on a 100BaseTx Switch and I've optimized both Samba and the Win98 clients that it serves, and it runs like a dream. SMB/CIFS is not a hopeless protocol. However, I would like to see an smbfs port someday rather than having to use smbclient or sharity... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message