From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Sep 27 10:30:33 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA07557
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:30:33 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA07552
          ; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:30:21 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA10418; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:23:36 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199509271723.KAA10418@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade"
To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:23:35 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, chuckr@eng.umd.edu,
        richard@harlequin.co.uk, freebsd-install@freebsd.org,
        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199509262258.PAA10812@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Sep 26, 95 03:58:47 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 353       
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> but an old fs is stil a valid fs under the new scheme!

Just never a clean one?  8-).

Remeber also that if one were upgrading from all the way back, the reserved
space for the bootblock has gotten larger.  8-(.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.