From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 11 21:28:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E3E16A417 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4B043D70 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8BLOrkU001480; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k8BLOrRr001479; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:24:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20060911212453.GA1441@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060907230525.202054fb@serene.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.1/gfortran 4.1 on FreeBSD 6/AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:28:12 -0000 On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > I've had no particular problems building either gcc 4.1 or 4.2 > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > except that the gcj compiler bombs with an error message about a missing > > "spec" file (I have no idea what such a file is supposed to contain). > > Hmm, I thought that GCJ does not fully work on FreeBSD/AMD64 yet? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25652 > Well, if someone in the Java camp would actually commit the patch in that PR, gcj would have a better shot at working. The PR also says the patch is based on a patch from the freebsd port. Looks like a catch-22. -- Steve