From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 20 5:31:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gidgate.gid.co.uk [193.123.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C55B15598 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 05:31:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.7) id NAA22537; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:29:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990420132918.007d9bf0@192.168.255.1> X-Sender: rbmail@192.168.255.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:29:18 +0100 To: Graham Wheeler From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: Using select() to implement a delay Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <371C67B3.1E7CE39A@cdsec.com> References: <3.0.6.32.19990420112535.007d27d0@192.168.255.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 13:40 20/04/99 +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote: >[...] > if (usec_dlay > 0) // we don't worry about signals for usecs Er, so your resolution is now no better than sleep(), but at least you are free of SIGALRM. -- Bob Bishop +44 118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 118 989 4254 (0800-1800 UK) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message