Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:22:47 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        keramida@freebsd.org
Cc:        sam@errno.com, flz@xbsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SIMPLEQ_* macros from OpenBSD sys/queue.h
Message-ID:  <20050714.002247.82101613.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050713210941.GA841@gothmog.gr>
References:  <20050712221444.GA1180@gothmog.gr> <42D56C15.2070400@errno.com> <20050713210941.GA841@gothmog.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050713210941.GA841@gothmog.gr>
            Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> writes:
: I couldn't agree more.  Helping source-level compatibility, as much as
: this can be accomplished for kernel code, is definitely a plus.  This is
: partly the reason why I noted that OpenBSD synchronized their queue.h
: header with NetBSD a few times in the past.  I just didn't propose
: something like this because I'm not sure I can convince any of the three
: BSD teams to s/SIMPLEQ/STAILQ/ or vice versa :-)

Yea, but adding the #defines to sys/queue.h in both directions likely
wouldn't hurt.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050714.002247.82101613.imp>