From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 15 23:21:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA13261 for current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 23:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA13247 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 23:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id IAA08817; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:00:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from knobel.gun.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA00436; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:58:48 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:58:48 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm To: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hysterical Raisons In-Reply-To: <199602160332.TAA00541@multivac.orthanc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Feb 1996, Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP wrote: > /usr/ports Unsupported ported code > /usr/local Whatever the *LOCAL* site wants to add I think this has been discussed some weeks ago very closely. Me, too, had some wishes, but... the consens is, not to implement changes to the ports collection. I think the meaning of the ports collection is, to help the people to get that wanted "local stuff" more quickly and in good porting quality into /usr/local. I think we should stop dicussing this again and again. You are free, to install the things into other directories. Andreas /// -- andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ $$ Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de $$ pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<