From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 31 08:41:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA20165 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 08:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.i1.net (root@mail1.i1.net [205.216.202.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA20160 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.i1.net (tbrown@mail1.i1.net [205.216.202.4]) by mail1.i1.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA16043; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 10:40:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 10:40:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Timothy Brown To: Frode Nordahl cc: Ernie Elu , "isp@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Shell? In-Reply-To: <199608311511.RAA04262@login.bigblue.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Won't ash do it? On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Frode Nordahl wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 1996 00:58:10 +1000 (EST), Ernie Elu wrote: > > >> Anyone know of a shell that supports filename completing (Like TCSH) that is SMALLER, (like csh or sh). > tcsh > >> eats up 1 MB of ram, so it's a bit "expensive" shell to use as default shell, but we need filename completion > >> when preessing ... > >> > >> Anyone? > >> --------------------------------- > >> Frode Nordahl > >> > >> > > > >I just use bash, seems to be robust. A bit less than 700kb per session. > > Yeah, but that still is more than 256K :) > --------------------------------- > Frode Nordahl > Timothy Brown InterNIC: TB1313 Chairman, Internet Service Providers' Consortium PGP Key Available Independent Consultant ph: 314/928.5545 2733 McClay Valley Blvd fax: 314/928.5250 St. Peters, MO 63376 pgr: 314/360.3408 cel: 314/303.2949 www: http://www.i1.net/~tbrown/