From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 23:00:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBAB106567A for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2EF8FC16 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o7SN0vtA014961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o7SN0vIe014960; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA23954; Sat, 28 Aug 10 15:54:31 PDT Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:54:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kc5vdj.freebsd@gmail.com Message-Id: <4c799393.wU/d2YpTieErDrD7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4C76AB76.4070806@gmail.com> <201008270856.43512.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C777D12.3040900@gmail.com> <201008271053.27731.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C78B0F4.4020002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C78B0F4.4020002@gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: writing usb drivers under 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:00:59 -0000 Jim Bryant wrote: > what kind of idiot defines a constant assignment for a 32k buffer as a > 15 bit left shift of 1? > > clever, yes. but in production, stupid. > > a constant should be just that, a constant, and thus require no > computation at runtime. Er, did you bother to look at the generated code before spouting off? Most compilers, even as far back as K&R 1st edition, will compute constant expressions like that at compile time.