Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 04:36:01 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? Message-ID: <10357.839417761@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 1996 19:02:31 %2B0800." <199608071102.TAA11374@spinner.DIALix.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The more I think about it, the more I'm changing my mind and coming to the > opinion that we can do a lot more with it if the parts that we need go > into src/contrib with the bmake build points in the correct part of the > tree as usual. And I believe that's even the politically correct method these days, too! :-) One gripe somebody had with Poul's TCL import was that he didn't also check in the script, be it ever so simple, that "created" the importable sources. NetBSD does this, a good example being in freefall:/c/NetBSD/NetBSD-current/src/gnu/usr.bin/gcc/gcc2netbsd, and I figure we should too. > I have other things on the agenda: > - libncurses Yay! I'd like to hack on the panel code until it's more usable, myself, but it's still waiting on whomever said they had libncurses last (thought it was Andrey). Weren't we also going to replace curses with it, as BSDI and NetBSD both agreed to do? > - cvs It'd be nice if we could get the read-only repository changes with this. I think anoncvs is worth making available, for one thing. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10357.839417761>