From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Oct 31 22:36:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA22881
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA22873;
          Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0vJDCv-0002sf-00; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 23:35:57 -0700
To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Subject: Re: rwhod buffer overflow bug 
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:41 PST."
		<199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> 
References: <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com>  
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 23:35:57 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0vJDCv-0002sf-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> Don Lewis writes:
: The wd_hostname buffer overflow bug in rwhod that came to light a couple
: months ago appears to have been fixed in -current, but the fix never
: seems to have been made to -stable.

I can do the CVS legwork if someone has a -stable system to test it
on.

Warner

P.S.  I just noticed and fixed two minor buffer related problems in
rwhod.c that I happened to notice as I was looking at this code.  Yow!