From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 23:57:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CD8106564A for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106F38FC12 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:56:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEGACoX7E2DaFvO/2dsb2JhbABTG4Qvk02PFqhnjiaPWoErg2yBCgSQeY9W X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,324,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="123010032" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-annu-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2011 19:56:58 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C951CB3F0C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:56:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:56:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: rc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <174446905.137501.1307318218787.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - IE7 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: Subject: scripts for review X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:57:02 -0000 Hi, I was wondering if you could take a look at the scripts in: http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/rc.conf this week, since I'd like to commit something to head by Jun 11, before I go away. There are 2 versions of the mountcritremote patch. - minimal 1 line change to fix it for the change in default NFS client OR - take out the NFS specific stuff, which seems to work for me, but might be riskier? I've also put an update to /etc/rc.d/nfsd which loads the old NFS server module, as required. With that change, I think /etc/rc.d/nfsserver can go away, since about all it did was load the module. Thanks in advance for any help with this, rick