From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 20 09:35:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC7916A4BF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AFD43FCB
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7KGZmFb081955;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:35:48 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030820123632.06b9ce70@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:38:10 -0400
To: mark@remotelab.org, stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F439819.2090006@remotelab.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517)
Subject: Re: Is rl broken?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:35:50 -0000

At 05:47 PM 20/08/2003 +0200, Marco Trentini wrote:
>>There were 2 commits to stable for the rl driver. The commit logs show
>>
>>My guess is you got the first commit, but not the second. rm -R'ing your 
>>src tree probably didnt do anything. It was the re-cvsup later which 
>>downloaded the second commit that fixed your problem.
>>In general, I find that if I am tracking stable, its important to watch 
>>the cvs-commit mailing list.
>
>I don't think which the problem is that.
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=55727


Perhaps, but for some it is.  It does seem that for people with the dlink 
branded cards there are still problems. But for me, the second commit fixed 
my problem with
rl0@pci1:0:0:   class=0x020000 card=0x813910ec chip=0x813910ec rev=0x10 
hdr=0x00
     vendor   = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
     device   = 'RT8139 (A/B/C/8130) Fast Ethernet Adapter'
     class    = network
     subclass = ethernet

         ---Mike