From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 24 14:41:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89DA2184; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615A119D; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38EFE9FDF7; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <551177B0.9080203@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:41:52 -0400 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ellis H. Wilson III" , freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org, kczekirda@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Patches to achieve bsdinstall script without dialogs References: <54EF7B40.2030706@panasas.com> <551172FC.1010508@panasas.com> <55117618.8020308@freebsd.org> <5511771C.7050500@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <5511771C.7050500@panasas.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Hs6lGTVWnGv4d7ShrHAfvV39aOOohIuRd" X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:41:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Hs6lGTVWnGv4d7ShrHAfvV39aOOohIuRd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-03-24 10:39, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote: > On 03/24/15 10:35, Allan Jude wrote: >> These changes look ok to me. >> >> 2 main things: These would need to be based on HEAD not 10.1 in order = to >> be committed >=20 > Understood -- I'll be glad to bring them up to HEAD, I just wanted to > get some conversation going about them first. Thanks for taking a look= ! >=20 >> And I wonder if they conflict with the FAI (Fast Automated Installer) >> patches, which I think also remove the dialogs >=20 > Can you point me at relevant discussion/bug/code for this? I did a > quick search on it as I wasn't aware of it, but only some email threads= > from 2010 came up. >=20 > Best, >=20 > ellis As far as I know, this is the "source of truth" for FAI https://svnweb.freebsd.org/socsvn/soc2014/kczekirda/pxe-fai-head/head/usr= =2Esbin/bsdinstall/ --=20 Allan Jude --Hs6lGTVWnGv4d7ShrHAfvV39aOOohIuRd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVEXewAAoJEJrBFpNRJZKfkHsQAIcMVXcMdM01s8jkpaEFl6o8 UXXQfLtyrI4l+gAXBan4jXXOxyL+RrCtNCVsZvLYrZnNWhWwqHgdwrr4/LbROf2c wLQfj7RVWWMZnapb/ylQMYEEDItzVMYUvgJkPmb8OnSxoJRu2k+J3DuAAGmexQJN RgyIMxA5bCZZcuCtTXJ9vyOqpvmqtiSQlCr5ReNqPeQUzItB1Pyhk+aXdCEKh71f 6CvEKK56fk+4mnA/NFc958EJ4M5blDYK08ag5D3ULWLFK77dJ/Xtyw5cXSJuytQY tl/uZINnU2jHhLrFVMedVtYtiIqO8RGrITT5uhBw/Q4mY19/Aay/wf1JMY9jeJVM LrRTfdIV6y+pR9WjrIXnJkB9lYtT2bu36lSGIbw00jVCzwTPQzTHzDV5/ojbxq1g s+w1xd/fCy824FAv/kMQRZqeYtY4BLpDB2m2CfxB5qE5aRXclz1eDUQSkhHj9WLj BZ1j09CZ5fCD39+vXkP0p+RzNx2VqHl2tbNymPUPSh8xxUA2I0/XZr35ZTeakKq7 kyIO86QgcGCFEFphsfD7OpPNvVatwigtPcbWcH/F05VypDewIjjVbwcobUOxuftC YpHMyZw/IgVwgrjg56bJGrz3niuefJ+tr6tc2mCJ3A318PaGrOX7NIfJs4JNF2x7 gEXJv7Sr4Dai2SI8NIkQ =uRaA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Hs6lGTVWnGv4d7ShrHAfvV39aOOohIuRd--