From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 24 12:01:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA23081 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsd.intrastar.net (BSD.INTRASTAR.NET [206.136.25.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA23075 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 12:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jsuter@localhost) by bsd.intrastar.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA00602; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 13:52:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 13:52:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Jacob Suter To: Ulf Zimmermann cc: "Mr. Jason A. Borgmann" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 128k ISDN vs. T1 In-Reply-To: <199608241819.LAA05321@Gatekeeper.Lamb.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Sorry to be rude, but another "Wanna-be-ISP". First it looks like you should > go and read more about what is possible in telecommunication hardware. > Like that ISDN is not upgradable over that 128K. That there exist Fractional > T1. Frame Relay. And so on and so on. as you would say on IRC: "Blah"... Yeah, one ISDN circuit is not upgradable, but you can generally get more ISDN circuits in effect getting more bandwidth. I would think anywhere where ISDN would be would generally have more than 20 users.... If the calling area sucks that bad scream at the telco and PUC.. Later....