From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 29 20:16:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mobile.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B7237B400 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0U4G8460288; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:16:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200101300416.f0U4G8460288@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Doug Barton Cc: "Koster, K.J." , "'skywizard@time.net.my'" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel Hacking (i tried not to make it lame) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:16:08 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Koster, K.J. wrote: > > > Dear Ariff, > > > > > > > > I remembered porting back cd9660 to 2.2.x tree, and now look > > > forward porting softupdates (If anybody can give me some light > > > I really appreciate that). I'm reviewing sources from current, > > > stable and from other BSD project such OpenBSD to pick all > > > the good stuffs. > > > I'm a happy 2.2.x user. > > > > > I think Yahoo! is using still on 2.2.8. > > Don't let your imagination run away with you. :) Well, it is no secret that we run older OS's, but they are *far* from stock boxes. Also, different locations sometimes use different setups. Anyway, we rarely run the standard network services on them. And yes, we do have some 2.1.5 boxes kicking around still. I believe the number of 4.x boxes has finally passed the number of 2.2.x boxes, about a week or two ago. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message