From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 03:13:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4D416A422 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE25443D45 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 21701 invoked by uid 399); 17 Jan 2006 03:13:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 03:13:13 -0000 Message-ID: <43CC60C5.90803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:13:09 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Panagiotis Astithas References: <43BCF31F.8050900@FreeBSD.org> <1136501778.40648.17.camel@localhost> <43C38A38.1020408@FreeBSD.org> <1136893017.2410.9.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <43C8E446.5010603@FreeBSD.org> <20060114144016.1dc9fdd0@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <43C97BEB.3030601@FreeBSD.org> <43CA33E4.40809@ebs.gr> In-Reply-To: <43CA33E4.40809@ebs.gr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Leidinger , pav@freebsd.org, freebsd ports Subject: Re: New /bin/sh based script to manage ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:13:16 -0000 Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Can portmaster be used to do something like 'portupgrade -rf gnutls' > (i.e. rebuild all dependent applications), like it is often requested in > UPDATING? At the moment, no. That feature is very low on my list of things to implement as I hardly ever find it necessary to do this. However, it would be a useful thing to implement, so I'll have a look at it. Thanks for the suggestion, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection