From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 02:23:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D1916A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:23:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wyvern.icir.org (wyvern.icir.org [192.150.187.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9CC43D45 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iA12Nj9l052905; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:23:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (guns.icir.org [68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD52F77A9D5; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:23:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9521F5B18; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:23:44 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce M Simpson From: Mark Allman In-Reply-To: <20041101002648.GB715@empiric.icir.org> Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR) Song-of-the-Day: 57 Channels MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:23:44 -0500 Sender: mallman@icir.org Message-Id: <20041101022344.5E9521F5B18@lawyers.icir.org> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP future: SACK plus DCR = better TCP over 802.11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mallman@icir.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:23:46 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > This looks promising: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr-01.txt > > Sounds as if it has been prototyped under the Linux stack. I will > try to find out more. Ethan Blanton and I have started working with these folks and we are going to soon have a new i-d out. We are renaming it "NCR" for non-congestion response. The basic idea remains as it is now. But, we're planning to specify things a bit more tightly and nail down some of the remaining corners. I'll try to remember to post a link to the i-d when it gets issued. (Hopefully this will happen in a couple weeks -- right after i-d submission opens after the IETF meeting in DC.) Thanks, allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBhZ4wWyrrWs4yIs4RAjRFAJ92EuADiCP10yU9xzmXEXMFQugGSwCdF9V3 XR7jEOGTOQbe4iYuYRA8aiQ= =Nn6L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--