Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:48:03 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> Cc: plk@in.nextra.sk, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd and ICMP 3.4 packets Message-ID: <20010713164803.A87098@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <01f101c10b9e$41482530$0e05a8c0@coffee>; from ari@suutari.iki.fi on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:18:05PM %2B0300 References: <20010710110934.D1048@in.nextra.sk> <20010712124152.A80584@sunbay.com> <20010713120211.B4366@in.nextra.sk> <017d01c10b87$b573a4f0$0e05a8c0@coffee> <20010713135855.A65898@sunbay.com> <01f101c10b9e$41482530$0e05a8c0@coffee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:18:05PM +0300, Ari Suutari wrote: > > > > > > Doesn't sound good that IP header with private IP address > > > gets sent to internet. - after all, the 195.168.3.210 host on internet > knows > > > nothing about 10.10.1.2... > > > > > We have discussed this before with Brian and Charles, and have come > > up to an agreement that FIREWALL should block these packets, not NAT. > > > > There must be something I don't understand now ? How is the host > on the internet now going to know that smaller MTU is required when > it sends packets to host inside nat'ed network ? > Give me a few days guys, OK? I will come up with a solution. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010713164803.A87098>