From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 5 02:36:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600816A4D3; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 02:36:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao05.cox.net (lakermmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CC743D5E; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 02:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040705023650.EEEM5935.lakermmtao05.cox.net@mezz>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:36:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:37:26 -0500 To: "Eric Anholt" References: <1088990415.987.9.camel@leguin> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1088990415.987.9.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependency fixing for xorg stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 02:36:51 -0000 On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 18:20:16 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/xorg-conv-1.diff You can remove the fluxbox-devel and fluxbox in this diff. The fluxbox-devel is no longer depend on XFree86-client. As for fluxbox will be remove too when maintainer approves or fluxbox-devel merges into fluxbox when 1.0 is released. A question, how would you like me to deal with the libXrender? The x11/gcursor, my port, will need the libXrender if xorg is installed. It doesn't need this if XFree86-lib is installed. If you already have this plan, then nevermind and I will wait. Thanks for your works! Cheers, Mezz > The link above is a patch to fix up dependencies and make xorg the > default X for FreeBSD 5.2 and up. It'll fix, XFree86-3 as well, > mostly. Personally, I think we should remove XFree86 3.3.6 from the > tree because it's a waste of everyone's time. People would be better > supported by current XFree86 or Xorg. (The one exception being very old > cards that never got updated drivers because basically nobody has them, > which will likely perform about as well and have only feature tradeoffs > when using the vesa driver instead) > > It needs more review, then I'll forward to portmgr. -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org