Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:31:16 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's time for 5.1-R bits Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0306091329080.619-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> In-Reply-To: <3EE3FD39.3020308@freebsd.org> References: <3EDF7E79.3000501@freebsd.org> <7mn0gw9ni0.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <3EDFE735.30604@freebsd.org> <3EE04C63.30203@freebsd.org> <20030609023437.GA25227@muse.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <3EE3FD39.3020308@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote: > I'm ll in favor of unifying the names. There is concern that changing the > names on the directories will cause the directory contents to be re-rsynced, > however. Can some other mirror operators comment on this? With less > than 11 hours before we announce, I hate to upset things. > i think the total resync would only be ~600Mbytes ? which to me is acceptable. the more so if you post saying you are doing it and give mirror admins a chance to manually change directory names before you make the change - maybe an hour? the longer it is delayed, the more mirrors will have started fetching it.. it is a a simple mv command after all right ? nothing too onerous. regards, -jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.50.0306091329080.619-100000>