From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 12 10:37:25 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2836B0C3D7
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sascha=freebsd-ports=freebsd.org=tnabszsg@root-login.org)
Received: from mx01.daemonground.de (mx01.daemonground.de
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:210:43e9:b5db:35d8:3e1:c3ee])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2C61191
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sascha=freebsd-ports=freebsd.org=tnabszsg@root-login.org)
Received: from [2a01:4f8:210:43e9:9e16:36c0:7509:536]
 (helo=admin.daemonground.de)
 by mx01.daemonground.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:256)
 (Exim) (envelope-from <sascha@root-login.org>)
 id 1apvhB-000Ipy-Db; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:37:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:37:19 +0200
From: Sascha Holzleiter <sascha@root-login.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4
In-Reply-To: <20160407064336.GR49864@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org>
 <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org>
 <20160407064336.GR49864@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
Message-ID: <b47d8360c0db1fcf9bb7e97273717692@mx01.daemonground.de>
X-Sender: sascha@root-login.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2-beta
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:37:26 -0000

On 2016-04-07 08:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> 
>> >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4:
>> […]
>> >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and pkg-1.7.0:
>> […]
>> >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=log are not indicating that behavior.
>> >> But I might have missed something.
>> >>
>> >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards,
>> >
>> > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain.
>> 
>> Ok, understood.
>> 
>> JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest 
>> time to reinstall.
>> 
>> > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8
>> 
>> Good to know, thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Just to follow up on the performance issue, there is a regression that 
> happened
> on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE (also HEAD) that causes pkg extraction process 
> to be 10
> times slower as it should. r297626 fixes it in head. We are working on 
> bringing
> that into the 10 branch:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=297626

Thanks for the fix! Will this also be fixed in 10.3-RELEASE? Being 
"stuck" with
the RELEASE branch per policy and looking forward to that kind of 
performance
for the next two years is really painful.