From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 02:12:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40E437B404 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 02:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhumketu.homeunix.net (dialpool-210-214-66-251.maa.sify.net [210.214.66.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E11443FA3 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 02:12:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shantanoo+fbsd@ieee.org) Received: by dhumketu.homeunix.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BBCA04543; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:37:23 +0530 (IST) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:37:23 +0530 From: Shantanu Mahajan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030428090723.GA580@dhumketu.homeunix.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030424202635.GA652@dhumketu.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030424202635.GA652@dhumketu.homeunix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Hmmm... I dunno X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE i386 Subject: Re: Time Problem in 5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 09:12:16 -0000 +++ Shantanu Mahajan [freebsd] [25-04-03 01:56 +0530]: | Hi! | I am useing 5.0R. | | > date;sleep 1;date | Fri Apr 25 01:53:44 IST 2003 | Fri Apr 25 01:53:46 IST 2003 | > | | I am not able to figure out the problem. any | comments? Here are few more examples. > date;sleep 5;date Mon Apr 28 14:13:45 IST 2003 Mon Apr 28 14:13:55 IST 2003 > date;sleep 10;date Mon Apr 28 14:14:26 IST 2003 Mon Apr 28 14:14:46 IST 2003 > date;sleep 15;date Mon Apr 28 14:15:24 IST 2003 Mon Apr 28 14:15:54 IST 2003 > Now, I started the timer simultaneously and found out that "sleep 5" give me dalay of 5 sec. properly. Maybe there is problem with date? Should I file a pr? (The machine used is *desktop* machine and don't have any load) Regards, Shantanu -- An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it.