From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 18 09:33:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA01090 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 09:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cerberus.partsnow.com (gatekeeper.partsnow.com [207.155.26.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01085 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 09:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bin@localhost) by cerberus.partsnow.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id CAA26326 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 02:30:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: cerberus.partsnow.com: bin set sender to using -f Received: from pcconsole(192.168.100.254) by cerberus.partsnow.com via smap (V2.0) id xma026323; Sun, 17 Aug 97 02:30:19 -0700 Message-ID: <33F87911.680B@PartsNow.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 09:32:17 -0700 From: Don Wilde Reply-To: don@PartsNow.com Organization: Soligen, Incorporated X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: X and FVWM2, AcceleratedX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have just boosted several of my machines to 2.2.2, and I find my window manger (fvwm2) is not happy. In searching the archives, I see reference from Doug that X32pex is needed, but I don't find that package on CDROM.com or XFree86.org. I have access to the X3.3.1 code, would it behoove me to update all the way, or just to find the PEX module? I'd definitely prefer fvwm2 to twm, and I'm not really impressed with XiG's CDE environment because its documentation is pitiful. A final question, now that XFree86 supports most of the S3 derivatives directly, is it still better to buy and run the Accelerated-X server? -- oooOOO O O O o * * * * * * o ___ _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ ___==_ V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde [don@PartsNow.com] [http://www.PartsNow.com ] /oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo--ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo--oo