From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 01:53:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E721065670 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@deman.com) Received: from plato.corp.nas.com (plato.corp.nas.com [66.114.32.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A758FC1F for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plato.corp.nas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB5DC8B18B5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:36:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at corp.nas.com Received: from plato.corp.nas.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.corp.nas.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vTWtVmOIJpP7 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (184-100-233-81.ptld.qwest.net [184.100.233.81]) by plato.corp.nas.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE18DC8B189E for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:36:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael DeMan Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:36:55 -0700 References: <1A85CB12-53BB-4D38-8671-10378F6AE4EC@deman.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-Id: <020081B1-A843-48CF-B79A-519BFC0A09FB@deman.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] best migration path from Solaris 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:53:36 -0000 Hi All, If folks here are interested, let me know and I will get the data up = somewhere on the benchmarks I am running. Definitely neither scientific nor rigorous - just 'bonnie bash' some = older hardware and see what happens. I can full data on the hardware up = as well. Thanks, - mike Begin forwarded message: > From: Michael DeMan > Date: March 18, 2011 6:06:25 PM PDT > To: David Brodbeck > Cc: Discussion list for OpenIndiana = , "zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org = discuss" > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] best migration path = from Solaris 10 >=20 > Hi David, >=20 > Caught your note about bonnie, actually do some testing myself over = the weekend. >=20 > All on older hardware for fun - dual opteron 285 with 16GB RAM. Disk = systems is off a pair of SuperMicro SATA cards, with a combination of WD = enterprise and Seagate ES 1TB drives. No ZIL, no L2ARC, no tuning at = all from base FreeNAS install. >=20 > 10 drives total, I'm going to be running tests as below, mostly = curious about IOPS and to sort out a little debate with a co-worker. >=20 > - all 10 in one raidz2 (running now) > - 5 by 2-way mirrors > - 2 by 5-disk raidz1 >=20 > Script is as below - if folks would find the data I collect be useful = information at all, let me know and I will post it publicly somewhere. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > freenas# cat test.sh > #!/bin/sh >=20 > # Basic test for file I/O. We run lots and lots of the tradditional > # 'bonnie' tool at 50GB file size, starting one every minute. = Resulting > # data should give us a good work mixture in the middle given all the = different > # tests that bonnnie runs, 100 instances running at the same time, and = at different > # stages of their processing. >=20 >=20 > MAX=3D100 > COUNT=3D0 >=20 > FILESYSTEM=3Dtestrz2 > LOG=3D${FILESYSTEM}.log >=20 >=20 > date > ${LOG} > echo "Test with file system named ${FILESYSTEM} and Configuration = of..." >> ${LOG} > zpool status >> ${LOG} >=20 > # DEMAN grab zfs and regular dev iostats every 10 minutes during test > zpool iostat -v 600 >> ${LOG} & > iostat -w 600 ada0 ada1 ada2 ada3 ada4 ada5 ada6 ada7 ada8 ada9 > = ${LOG}.iostat &=20 >=20 >=20 > while [ $COUNT -le $MAX ]; do > echo kicking off bonnie > bonnie -d /mnt/${FILESYSTEM} -s 50000 & > sleep 60; > COUNT=3D$((count+1)); > done; >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:26 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: >=20 >> I'm in a similar position, so I'll be curious what kinds of responses = you get. I can give you a thumbnail sketch of what I've looked at so = far: >>=20 >> I evaluated FreeBSD, and ruled it out because I need NFSv4, and = FreeBSD's NFSv4 support is still in an early stage. The NFS stability = and performance just isn't there yet, in my opinion. >>=20 >> Nexenta Core looked promising, but locked up in bonnie++ NFS testing = with our RedHat nodes, so its stability is a bit of a question mark for = me. >>=20 >> I haven't gotten the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate OpenIndiana, = yet. It's only available as a DVD ISO, and my test machine currently = has only a CD-ROM drive. Changing that is on my to-do list, but other = things keep slipping in ahead of it. >>=20 >> For now I'm running OpenSolaris, with a locally-compiled version of = Samba. (The OpenSolaris Samba package is very old and has several = unpatched security holes, at this point.) >>=20 >> --=20 >> David Brodbeck >> System Administrator, Linguistics >> University of Washington >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >=20 > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss