From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 26 13:44:15 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341D16A418;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B21813C507;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61012084;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.1/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D4E2083;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 61B6784485; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:03 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20071115074247.GQ37473@egr.msu.edu>
	<20071115123543.H82897@fledge.watson.org>
	<1195132320.6039.135.camel@hurina>
	<20071115135734.O82897@fledge.watson.org> <86ir3p4203.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20071126125413.U65286@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20071126125413.U65286@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's
	message of "Mon\, 26 Nov 2007 12\:58\:23 +0000 \(GMT\)")
Message-ID: <86abp13yvw.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
	Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu>, mohans@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: link() not increasing link count on NFS server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:44:15 -0000

Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> While their workaround is better than our workaround, is there reason
> to believe that a request is more likely to be dropped than a reply,
> and that their workaround is therefore better than no workaround?

I didn't read the whole thread before replying.  I don't think the
workaround is needed at all in FreeBSD.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no