Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:03:44 -0400 From: Adam McLaurin <blueeskimo@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed - move to ports-bugs? Message-ID: <1061989424.1672.3.camel@jake> In-Reply-To: <20030824191846.GA1116@chetwood.ru> References: <200308221030.h7MAUs35088836@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <20030824191846.GA1116@chetwood.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-L0y1Dom549SsGyA7iL7Q Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 15:18, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > As much as I love reading through these endless messages of great > wisdom ;) but I would really love to see them sent to freebsd-ports-bugs > instead of freebsd-ports. IMHO, they will reach much better audience > there, and unclutter freebsd-ports for Ports *discussions*. >=20 > Anyone feeling the same? I just use a filter on the Subject line to put these in a convenient subfolder. I do appreciate knowing when the INDEX is borked (especially with things like the 'Out of memory error') so I can avert problems locally. Kris is right, without the INDEX emails to Ports, we'd be inundated with INDEX failures every time something goes wrong. This is a much more controlled way of notifying everyone of problems. --=20 Adam McLaurin <blueeskimo@gmx.net> --=-L0y1Dom549SsGyA7iL7Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/TKwwt+DSc2Q4lGYRAvgQAJ9EqqqyhJDW9mTts2GttTf0tsTBXACeINtI Kj9llTYX/uJaIhNdy4KGfiY= =myZt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-L0y1Dom549SsGyA7iL7Q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1061989424.1672.3.camel>