From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 17 10:24:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA22806
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macro.stanford.edu (macro.Stanford.EDU [36.59.0.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22792
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from skippy@localhost) by macro.stanford.edu (8.8.2/8.7.1) id KAA33754; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:24:25 -0700
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Studenmund <skippy@macro.stanford.edu>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Bill Studenmund <skippy@macro.stanford.edu>
Subject: Netatalk1.4b1 speed patches
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.95.970417100837.31293A-100000@macro.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


I just helped finish porting NetAtalk to NetBSD, and we've run into a
problem I thought y'all had seen, and was wondering what y'all did about
it.

The problem is that copying files to/from the UN*X box is SLOW for some
systems. The web page which had the patches for NetAtalk also had a
pointer to a page with speed-up patches. That's the page I'm looking for,
but I can't find it. Can someone give me pointers?

Oh, and thanks again for all the FreeBSD work on porting NetAtalk. The
NetBSD port of the user code mainly was changing all the #ifdef's from
__FreeBSD to BSD4_4. :-)

Take care,

Bill

P.S. Please keep my EMail in the replies as I can't subscribe to the list
(I'm melting in lists at the moment).