From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jul 20 12:59:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from luke.pmr.com (luke.pmr.com [207.170.114.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4151525D for ; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 12:59:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bob@luke.pmr.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.pmr.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA02411; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:59:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:59:19 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Nick Hibma Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/12496: yppush broken when pushing to 2 or more slaves Message-ID: <19990720145919.B2152@luke.pmr.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <199907201540.IAA39625@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Nick Hibma on Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 09:51:46PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 09:51:46PM +0200, Nick Hibma wrote: > > > Well, you have one real slave but the master appears in your ypservers > > > line as well, IIRC. So yppush upgrades a) the real slave and b) the master > > > and this makes again two hosts to be contacted by yppush. > > > > Hmm, true. I had forgotten about that. Seems this is the second time > > you have pointed it out to me. :-( > > Does it solve your problem? Yes, it did (I have no idea what side-effects there may be, however). -- Bob Willcox Don't tell me that worry doesn't do any good. bob@pmr.com I know better. The things I worry about don't Austin, TX happen. -- Watchman Examiner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message