From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct 20 14:17:23 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA04362
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA04353
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 14:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id UAA08931; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:20:03 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199810201920.UAA08931@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: bpf write overwrites link level header?
To: beekey@clark.net
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:20:02 +0100 (MET)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <362CB750.5ECC@clark.net> from "beekey@clark.net" at Oct 20, 98 12:15:57 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> it comes out correct).  Looking briefly at the code in
> /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c, it appears that bpf may add its own link level
> header.
> 
> Anyone have any experience or fixes/workarounds for this?  I don't think
> that it is a NIC limitation due to some testing under NT.

for sure it isn't a NIC limitation since i do specify my own header
when doing bridging.

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message