From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 03:55:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9779A106564A for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348F8FC08 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr0Od-000Au4-7t for freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:55:43 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:54:34 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1145317277.20110220045434@nitronet.pl> To: Jack Vogel In-Reply-To: References: <410175608.20110220013900@nitronet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Brandon Gooch , freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Panic] Dummynet/IPFW related recurring crash. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:55:44 -0000 > I've never seen a trace like this, and no absolutely nothing about dummyn= et, sorry. > If it is in some way em's fault, then making sure you have the latest cod= e would be > a good idea. I have a test driver that is under selective test, it does e= ffect the code > path that you seem to be in, so it might be worth a try. If you want to t= ry it early > just pipe up and I'll send it. I'm less and less sure that it has anything to do with em. I'd like to hear Luigi's take on all this. That being said, I'll gladly try the new driver -- if I'm right, I'll drop under 7 day reboot threshold later into the year anyway, so I really need a permanent solution of some kind. Apparently next crash always comes sooner that previous one, which coincides with growing traffic.