From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 26 15:35:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA05605 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:35:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from strato-fe0.ultra.net (strato-fe0.ultra.net [146.115.8.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA05591 for <"freebsd-net@"@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:35:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from moncrg@ma.ultranet.com) Received: from ma.ultranet.com (d186.dial-5.cmb.ma.ultra.net [209.6.68.186]) by strato-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult.n14767) with ESMTP id SAA16649; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:34:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <35E49BB9.BF3CB38B@ma.ultranet.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:35:21 -0500 From: "Gregory D. Moncreaff" Reply-To: moncrg@ma.ultranet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Giannoni CC: "freebsd-net@"@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NETCCITT sources References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'd vote for it! I also tried to sound out about NETISO but it seems that only 3 or so people ask about it a year and that is not enough of a "horde" for him? you'd think that it wouldn't be a big issue since Net/Open BSDs still have it Of course by dropping it FreeBSD is losing some of its heritage... I'd really prefer to stick with FreeBSD but might be forced to consider Net/Open... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message