From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Wed Aug 19 15:23:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49DB9BCD91 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp) Received: from vmmb.gunma-ct.ac.jp (ifw.gunma-ct.ac.jp [210.151.113.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F68889D for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp) Received: from abel.nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp (abel.nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp [172.16.64.42]) by vmmb.gunma-ct.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B4541398; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:23:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from riemann.nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp (riemann [172.16.66.61]) by abel.nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id t7JExQ6X076611; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:59:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7JFE4Km015521; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:04 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:04 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20150820.001404.104049290.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> To: stephen@missouri.edu Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? From: Yasuhito KAMINAGA In-Reply-To: <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> References: <55D3E582.2030908@missouri.edu> <20150819.122822.193714783.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:23:26 -0000 Thank you Stephen kindly for the advice. Unfortunately, I'm now busy and have no time to try svn. If the majority of the subscribers of ctm-users agree to closing ctm and you believe it is the best way, then I respect the opinion. ***************** From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 04:05:26 +0000 Message-ID: <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> > Can you try to see if you can get svn to work? > > Another approach is that people could have a repository of svn at home, > and then create deltas at home, and bring that to work, either by > emailing it to themselves, or by taking it in on a flash drive. > > This can be achieved purely by using svnadmin dump (to create the > deltas) and svnadmin load (to apply the deltas). The current mkCTM and > ctm commands are merely wrappers to these commands when they handle > svn-cur. (Most of the overhead is packaging it into the CTM structure, > creating checksums, and compressing the data.) > > If this last approach is viable, I could provide a few more details of > how to do this - maybe write some simple script.