From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 11 19:28:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1FC106564A; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalitoja@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A018FC08; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so8788791gyf.13 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=TYGWb/GassZeVGGSHiyuulvaETgQTYYNez3WUte7lJs=; b=klJP9t+m8s7dmye4nogXUHFwapP/aJ4VZOXrrJ8cMobnDMt+/IrZj3wq6sAh2a8rgO zIIqOwaIw8Mc38u526kD3NQEmv21Ut7kMl2X6TKsaQUGLmh/4kH4oh79dulYXBs2OLK3 KMN0Ivm6H83ZsTHOLMPm5u/0v4gkXOMVlYGn4= Received: by 10.42.163.4 with SMTP id a4mr13940380icy.4.1318361287665; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nil (lumumba.torservers.net. [77.247.181.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm9132987ibc.3.2011.10.11.12.27.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Nali Toja To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:59:08 -0700") Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:27:47 +0000 Message-ID: <86y5wrnxak.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD Current , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Patch for ports on 10-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:28:09 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch [...] > +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000000 && !defined(NO_AUTOTOOLS_FIX) Being not limited to GNU_CONFIGURE, is it a feature? Also, there are a few ports that either set WRKSRC instead of BUILD_WRKSRC or extract several distfiles. Why not use WRKDIR then? # lang/python27, it does not use devel/libffi (ports/146823) WRKSRC/../Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure: freebsd1*) WRKSRC/../Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure:freebsd1*)