From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Aug  1  5:15:26 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD537B938
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2000 05:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA26665;
	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET>
Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: is fetch broken?
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008010723300.4997-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 01 Aug 2000 14:15:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: Matt Heckaman's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2000 07:27:34 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <xzpg0op5ga3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> writes:
> I hope that helps :)

Yes. The estimated size is wrong due to an incorrect typecast, so
fetch(1) complains that it doesn't match the actual size. The received
file is almost certainly complete and correct.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message