From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Sep 13 11:02:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7258D3D5236 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bq6540DqQz42vG for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6058D4A21C; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 178BBE708BF; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5ZncYhJkAgH; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:b114:f466:15ee:a76b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2832E708BE; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: sreehari Cc: "FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: 12.2-BETA1 iwm init failed on Intel 9560 (ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen7) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:01:54 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6151) Message-ID: <912D6AC5-6CCE-4137-A1F1-A8D8A3084439@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bq6540DqQz42vG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net designates 2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.57 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.014]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zabbadoz.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.19)[-0.190]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.061]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[FreeBSD-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:02:01 -0000 On 13 Sep 2020, at 5:30, sreehari wrote: > I just realized the link may be broken because of the dot after, here > it is: https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=5669 > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:25 PM sreehari > wrote: >> >> I tested FreeBSD 12.2-BETA1 and I have a ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen7 >> (which has an Intel 9560 wifi chipset), and I was looking forward to >> working wifi in the next FreeBSD release. I see that some work was >> done to add support for my wifi chipset, and I appreciate the >> efforts! >> I just thought that this information would be helpful to developers >> to >> ensure that wifi properly functions for more people in time for the >> full 12.2-RELEASE. Basically, iwm does indeed detect my “Intel(R) >> Dual >> Band Wireless AC 9560” unlike in 12.1-RELEASE, but it seems to fail >> on >> firmware or ucode loading with these lines: >> >> >> iwm0: mem 0xea238000-0xea23bfff >> at device 20.3 on pci0 >> iwm0: fw chunk addr 0x404000 len 712 failed to load >> iwm0: iwm_pcie_load_section: Could not load the [0] uCode section >> iwm0: iwm_start_fw: failed 60 >> iwm0: Failed to start INIT ucode: 60 >> >> I believe that wifi did in fact work in the September 10th prerelease >> build (I may be wrong), but the system was still pretty unusable for >> different or possibly related reasons so maybe that could be of help. >> I’ve attached a full dmesg to >> https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=5669. I’l follow-up on the PR you also opened here https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249287 /bz