From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 08:51:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A8816A4DF for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@sysfault.org) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBB243D4C for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail@sysfault.org) Received: (qmail 14844 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2006 08:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO medusa.sysfault.org) (936934@[81.14.177.16]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2006 08:51:01 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=medusa.sysfault.org) by medusa.sysfault.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GIiJ5-000Noh-Dr; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:53:51 +0200 Received: (from marcus@localhost) by medusa.sysfault.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k7V8roD9091554; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:53:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcus) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:53:50 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, edwin@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060831085350.GA889@medusa.sysfault.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Cc: Subject: devel/sdl12 update and version bump X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcus von Appen List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:51:07 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I updated sdl12 to the latest stable version 1.2.11 on my system and thought, that it might be a good thing to incorporate the both related reports ports/99943 and ports/70900 (which can be closed then). As both ports/70900 suggests, the patch matches the SDL version 1.2. So instead of using 'sdl11' and 'SDL11', ... one would use 'sdl12', 'SDL12', ... According to a quick `find /usr/ports -type f |xargs grep "sdl11"` there are 37 ports with 42 files, which would need to be patched, http://www.sysfault.org/sdl12-patch.log and around 400-500 ports would possibly need a version bump to chase the update (according to the usage of USE_SDL in /usr/ports). Anyways, I personally dislike the sdl-config naming hack as it simply has no use anymore and is applied to a _stable_ version. Instead of using SDL12, sdl12-..., I would use the default. There is only one libSDL port available at the moment, libSDL 1.3 is still in development and I do not think, that the majority of applications will switch to libSDL 1.3 instantly when it is out. Thus I'd vote to make the critical jump, drop the renaming for devel/sdl12 and fix up all related ports. If a devel/sdl13 port is about to be committed, we can rename it, wait for the majority of ports to be usable with it and then drop (if no longer needed) sdl12 completely or change it back to sdl12-... or whatever else. Another possible solutions would be symlinks to the current stable and favourized sdl version, which match the SDL defaults. It also would ease a lot for developers as they would not have to care about the FreeBSD specific renaming scheme. So before I submit another pr for sdl12 which is rejected, I'd like to hear, whether the patch for 1.2.11 (or the 1.2 branch in general) should use=20 a) SDL12 sdl12-config, sdl12.pc... (logical fix for FreeBSD renaming b) SDL11 sdl11-config, sdl11.pc... (current default) c) SDL, sdl-config, sdl.pc (SDL default) d) ln -s (symlinks to the renamed stuff to ease life for developers and porters) I am not subscribed to freebsd-ports, so please put me into the CC when you answer to the list. Regards Marcus --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE9qOeo/JpszXavhwRAmNPAKCGWyZfLk1fZZhkpk98hPLI2yZA7wCfe2r3 Gl1VtocpQPin1bZvwXgCQt4= =yGQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--