From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 13:17:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DF5359 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8F48FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA2DHggQ079213; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:17:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA2DHgt8079212; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:17:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:17:42 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) Message-ID: <20121102131742.GB79087@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <5093BC40.8@missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5093BC40.8@missouri.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:17:43 -0000 On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN? > Sigh. You can get copies of the final committee drafts of the Fortran 95, 2003, and 2008 standards. There you will learn that Fortran since Fortran 90 allows two source forms: fixed-form and free-form source code. When parsing the the above nonsense you wrote, one form would yield one (invalid) token, and in the other form it would yield 11 tokens. -- Steve