From owner-cvs-usrbin  Fri Sep 27 20:36:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-usrbin
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA28247
          for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA28002;
          Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA08584; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 21:35:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199609280335.VAA08584@rover.village.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xinstall xinstall.c 
To: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Reply-To: hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 27 Sep 1996 19:53:52 PDT."
		<199609280253.TAA05179@freefall.freebsd.org> 
References: <199609280253.TAA05179@freefall.freebsd.org>  
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 21:35:11 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[followups directed to hackers, hence the cc]

In message <199609280253.TAA05179@freefall.freebsd.org> Warner Losh writes:
:   Use EX_* exit values, from NetBSD

A more complete description:

Obtained From: NetBSD

Merge a couple of trivial differences between NetBSD's and FreeBSD's
versions of the source in the area of exit() values and lint comments.
While many differences still exist, there are fewer now than there
were before.

What happended, which was odd:

I tried to checkin this in with EDITOR set to vi, and all I got was
the following:

7:43pm freefall:[64]> cvs commit xinstall.c
/var/tmp/tmp.1.020716: permission denied
cvs [commit aborted]: Logfile verification failed
7:43pm freefall:[64]>

so I did a cvs commit -m"blah" xinstall.c and it succeeded.  Strange
that.  I got the message three times in a row, so punted :-(.

I didn't have much time to look into the problem because of the large
packet loss between here and freefall :-(.

Warner